Risk and Assessment in Aesthetic Consultations
The interest in facial aesthetics and appearance has been described as a common universal social phenomenon. It is reflected in the rise of non-surgical procedures across various generations and demographics over the past decades. Some theories state that there is a tendency to normalize and even trivialize cosmetic procedures because they are so easily accessible and affordable and are accompanied by an existing lack of regulation in the UK. However, viewed from a clinical standpoint, aesthetic medicine is founded on the four fundamental principles of medical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. This is notwithstanding the historical doctrine that the discipline of aesthetic practice is separate from medical specialties that focus more on therapeutic healthcare services.
Patient Assessment and Risk Management:
Patient assessment is crucial in aesthetic medicine because it enables Aesthetic Practitioners to gather vital information about a patient's medical history, understand their objectives, and determine their suitability for non-surgical treatments. A comprehensive patient assessment will uncover any underlying medical conditions, evaluate the patient’s physical and psychological readiness for any suggested treatments, and help to set their expectations. The assessment phase incorporates risk management, essential for mitigating potential risks, complications and involves evaluating contraindications and implementing safety protocols to minimise the occurrence of adverse events. Clinicians should endeavour to guarantee, to the greatest extent foreseeable, the safety and efficacy of any proposed aesthetic procedure. In conjunction, the clinician should utilise their prior skills and experience to identify the potential risks of future complaints. This can be accomplished by evaluating the dynamics of the interaction between the patient and Clinician during the consultation, a competency typically acquired through reflective practice and clinical experience.
Consultation Process:
By establishing a mutual agreement with the patient during the consultation, the Clinician can evaluate all risks and benefits, thereby determining which intervention or treatment will offer the maximum advantage to the patient. Effective consulting represents a communicative process that entails listening to the patient's unique narrative while simultaneously extracting crucial information and devising a tailored, safe, and effective treatment plan. During a consultation, the clinician should simultaneously engage in two advanced cognitive tasks; attentive listening and clinical reasoning. Consequently, if the Clinician gathers an adequate history and conducts a physical examination, they avoid arriving at an incorrect diagnosis, likely resulting in an unsuitable treatment plan for the patient.
Communication:
The success of any consultation is founded significantly on the quality of communication between the patient and Aesthetic Practitioner, with the underlying foundation largely dependent on the nature of their relationship. These factors will ascertain whether any proposed treatment will likely enhance overall health, well-being, and quality of life. The patient should be allowed to thoroughly comprehend which procedure will optimally address their aesthetic concerns, which should be validated through the Clinician's anatomical diagnosis.
Treatment Recommendations:
It is also crucial to acknowledge that some patients may have a preconceived treatment preference; however, it remains the Clinician's responsibility to recommend a treatment that, based on their professional judgment of the patient's aesthetic needs, is most likely to provide the best outcomes.
The Importance of Empathetic Listening & the Role of Trust:
Research highlights the importance of attentive listening during consultations to understand a patient’s motivations and expected outcomes. Aesthetic practitioners, with the benefit of longer consultations in private practice, should avoid a rushed, impersonal approach. Even without obvious medical conditions, patients remain vulnerable and require respect. Patient satisfaction is closely tied to personal identity, with outcomes often subjective, and building trust during the initial consultation is essential.
Managing Expectations:
Aesthetic clinicians are responsible for ensuring patients comprehend all aspects of a procedure, and must documentation all discussions. At the same time, transparency and support within the scope of practice are imperative. Furthermore, a patient-centered approach that respects patient identity, concerns, and preferences aids in clarifying patients' problems. Furthermore, communicating treatment options, enhancing empathy, and improving perceptions of clinician attentiveness are all part of managing expectations. Moreover, understanding the patient's mindset is crucial for meeting their unique needs and avoiding treatments for patients whose expectations or requirements exceed the practitioner's competence.The importance of face-to-face consultations in building trust and providing accurate information, thus ensuring patients have realistic expectations and improving the likelihood of optimal outcomes.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2017) Cosmetic procedures: ethical issues, [online] Available from: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/Cosmetic-procedures-fullreport. [Accessed: 22.01.24]
Luckman, M. (2014) Avoiding litigation: What aesthetic Nurses need to Know about handling complaints. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing, 3(6), pp.296–298.
Medical Protection. (2024) The four principles of medical ethics, [online] Available from: https://www.medicalprotection.org/uk/articles/essential-learning-law-and-ethics. [Accessed 10.02. 24].
Feng, L.F. (2020) Characteristics and emerging trends in modern aesthetic medicine. Chinese Medical Journal, [online] (6), pp.741–742. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000000679. [Accessed 12.02.24].
Bowling, A., Rowe, G., Lambert, N., Waddington, M., Mahtani, K., Kenten, C., Howe, A. and Francis, S. (2012) The measurement of patients’ expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients’ expectations. Health Technology Assessment, [online] 16 (30). Available from: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta16300. [Accessed 12.02.24).
Neighbour, R. (2018) The inner consultation, [online]. Routledge: Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9780203736548/inner-consultation-roger-neighbour. [Assessed 18.02.24].
Read, S. and Hill, HF. (2005) Dermatology malpractice experience: Clinical settings for risk management. Journal of American Academy of Dermatology, [online] (53) pp.134–7. Available from: https://www.jaad.org/article/S0190-9622(05)00686-9/abstract [Accessed: 10.02.24]
Khunger, N (2014) Risk assessment and prevention of complications in aesthetic surgery. J Cutaneous Aesthetic Surgery, [online] 7 (3) pp. 141-2. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4271292/ [Accessed: 10.02.24].
Anderson, B. (2019) Reflecting on the communication process in health care. Part 2: the management of complaints. British Journal of Nursing, 28 (14), pp.927-929.
Wicklund, A.K. (2022) Implementing the medical model in aesthetic consultation. Plastic and Aesthetic Nursing, 42 (1), pp.31-34.
Singh, H. (2021) A five-step communication model to minimise complaints about aesthetic treatment. BDJ In Practice, 34 (11), pp.25-25
Ali, Z., Ashley, M. and West, C. (2013) Factors to consider when treatment planning for patients seeking comprehensive aesthetic dental treatment. Dental update, 40(7). pp.526-533.
Demosthenous, N (2017). Clinical consultation skills: a personal reflection on history-taking and assessment in aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing (6) 9, pp.460-464.
Caldwell, G. (2019) The process of clinical consultation is crucial to patient outcomes and safety: 10 quality indicators. Clinical medicine, [online] 19 (6), pp.503–506. available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470211824001064?via%3Dihub. [Accessed: 10.02.24].
Usherwood, T. (1999) Understanding the Consultation [online] McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Available from:https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Understanding_the_Consultation/tLlEBgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Usherwood,+T.,+1999.+Understanding+the+consultation.+McGraw-Hill+Education+(UK).&pg=PP1&printsec=frontcover. [Accessed 20. 02.24].
Gill, C. and Wong, V., 2021. The Cosmetic Consultation. In Decision Making in Aesthetic Practice (pp. 1-10). CRC Press.
Brackenbury, J. (2014) How, why and when can aesthetic nurses say no to a prospective patient? Journal of Aesthetic Nursing, 3 (9), pp.442-443.
McDonald, C.B., Hart, S., Liew, S. and Heydenrych, I. (2022) The Importance of Patient Mindset: Cosmetic Injectable Patient Experience Exploratory Study—Part 1. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum, [online] 8 (4), Available from: doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac043. PMID: 35769690; PMCID: PMC9225726. [Accessed: 10.02.24].
Lamontagne, F. (2023) Establishing trust through clear communication and shared decision-making. CMAJ, [online] 195 (49), pp.E1725–E1726. Available from: doi:https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.231583. [Accessed: 10.02.24].
Haswell, N. (2019) The four ethical principles and their application in aesthetic practice. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing, 8(4), pp.177-179
Wondergem, F. (2019) Building an ethical bridge to quality in aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing, 8(3), pp.132-135.
Brackenbury, J. (2018) Managing expectations: an important part of the aesthetic consultation. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing, 7 (629), pp. 324–327.